Thursday, December 29, 2011

Gold Digger's of 1933..... with some of the gals.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from the Bonnie Bannon Blog! I think I found and purchased this in 2010. It could be one of my favorite group shots of my Grandmother that I did not inherit. While I am sure that you know, but just in case you don't, she is third from the right. ;)

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Gold Digger's of 1933.... take two.


In my opinion, this picture was probably taken within minute of the other "Gold Digger's photo. The interesting story behind this is that I found it in a frame behind "take one". Had I not been curious as to what might also be in there, I would not have found it. To look at it (in the photo's border) you can tell that it was not used as a publicity photo, but might have been an alternate. I think a friend or two has commented to me that they like this one better, I guess the powers-that-be had other ideas. I do have to wonder how many years this photo languished behind the better-known photo..... nearly 80 years perhaps? That said, I hope that you might enjoy looking at both.






Bonnie Bannon, center.





























Gold Digger's of 1933.... take one.

Bonnie Bannon, yep... that ain't changed.
This picture I found in my late Grandmother's collection. This was probably the picture most used in the publicity photos from "Gold Digger's". I like it for a lot of reasons, but not the least of which is my Grandmothers hand-written stats on the back, a practice done by actors and actresses for years.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Mary, Lucy, Bonnie, and the really big strawberry.

L-R, Mary Lange, Lucille Ball, Bonnie Bannon
I found this fantastically obscure picture over 11 years ago in my Grandmother's publicity photo collection. As mentioned on the header, it is from the movie "Kid Millions". I remember going through the scrapbook with this photo in it, and while looking at the caption that she wrote in the margin (in the early 1930's?) I saw the name Lucille Ball. I had to look at it again as I don't think I had ever seen Lucy in anything this old. I felt (then and now) that this is too great a picture to not share, so share I did. I sent it to the owner (Thomas Wilson) of www.lucyfan.com a few years ago where it can still be found to this day. I am posting this on the 100th birthday of Lucille Ball. I hope that it is still appreciated as a very early "Goldwyn Girl" picture of her.


Tuesday, July 19, 2011

That Night in Rio.


Here is yet another online purchase (I think). I saw this movie on TCM once, and while I remember little about it, little is an apt description of Bonnie's part. As I recall, I believe this to have been a fluffy. Don Ameche movie.

Is that really a dress? From "Golddigger's of 1933"


And yet another little gem that I acquired on Ebay in the last year or so. Like the header says, it is a publicity photo from "Golddigger's of 1933". They got a goodly amount of mileage out of this photo as I have seen old newspaper articles that have used it as a "stock" photo when writing about her. You can go most any day to Ebay and see an artist's rendition of this photo that was used as a lobby card. You need only search "Gold digger's of 1933" to see it. It will usually be a cool little mini-poster (14x16) I think. I saw a genuine, 6 foot original go for about 6000 dollars a few years ago. I think this "dress" is just some sheer material that they pinned on her...... There really isn't that much to it.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Bonnie jumping rope

I think I found this little gem on Ebay a year or so ago. Sadly, I don't have it in front of me right now, so I am not sure what movie was being promoted, if any. That said, I still think it is a fun picture.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Screen Play Magazine Dec. 1933


For over ten years, I have been in possession of this magazine. I finally got around to having a friend scan this small article as mostly written by Bonnie Bannon, my (late) Grandmother. I say mostly because there are a few errors in it that I and at least one other family member see. It is my understanding now, that Editors back in the day used to "tweak" a submitted article sometimes. That doesn't mean that it isn't a fun article to read, just that it might not be completely factual. I hope that you enjoy it.